User talk:Amitie 10g

Amitie 10g (talk · contributions · Number of edits · recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Archives Archives: April to December 2017 January to March 2017 July to December 2016 January to June 2016 August 2015 to december 2015 April 2015 to August 2015 March 2015 and previous

Talk page access 2018

@Taivo: Talk page access was removed in October 2017 with the rationale "unblock request was rejected". Considering the time elapsed, and that talk page access is rarely removed from accounts that are not globally blocked, could you please restore this user's ability to write on their own talk page?

As a point of information, it should be noted the involvement of Daphne Lantier (talk · contribs · logs · block log) not long before this account was blocked. The facts behind the sockpuppetry of 'Daphne Lantier' was not understood at the time of the first significant block. Regardless of the behaviour of Amitie_10g, this background may be relevant when considering a future unblock request.

Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

I am agree to enable talk page access, but not before @Ellin Beltz: agrees as well. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I do not agree to talk page access. I do not agree to lifting this block at all - in any form or in any part. That an administrator now blocked was involved at sometime in the past is not a valid reason to overturn a block that was earned by the user on multiple occasions and in multiple locations. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Hi Ellin. In the light that there is no global block, nor any oversight issue, how is removing talk page access in this case supported by existing Wikimedia Commons policy? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, Fae I mis-edited or typed too fast. It should read: "I do not agree to [limit or remove] talk page access. I do not agree to lifting this block at all...". I was trying to show the difference between the two actions and mistyped. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. That makes sense. If there is a block appeal, then it is healthier for the applicant to be able to make the case openly rather than off-wiki, unless there are known oversight issues or this page gets misused for resurrecting unnecessary drama.

@Taivo: there appears to be no rationale to keep this talk page closed. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 22:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:PD-Chile-doc

{{PD-Chile-doc}}
Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-Chile-doc Warko (talk) 20:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Algeria

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Algeria está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es media. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es 2018-05-06.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 08:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Huge_SVGs_rendered_incorrectly_(Bug_T111815)

Category:Huge_SVGs_rendered_incorrectly_(Bug_T111815) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

JoKalliauer (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es alta.

This month the UNESCO Wiki Loves Earth photo contest takes place. For this photo contest we need an small update in the file marker template. Thank you!

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Yet another unblock request in good faith

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "More than one year passed since my lattest block. I know very well the reasons and I understand how the affected users feel. One of my main reasons to request the unblock is, as I stared a heavy campaign to improve the Spanish Wikipedia, and I want to upload or transfer several files (some of them logos I vectorised). Also, another reason is for discussing some impor lovetant subjects, specially copyright (namely, related to Peru). I apologize the issues caused the last year. I want to collaborate again, so I promise it will not occur again (but, as I mentioned previously, we need the collaboration of everyone). Amitie 10g (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)" Decline reason: "There is no consensus to unblock, unblocking arguments are weak, and the request does not set forth an adequate understanding of the issue or credible commitment to discontinue--our requirements. 1) There is nothing magical about a single revolution of the earth about the sun; the test, the aforementioned requirements, does not depend on an arbitrary length of time. Even if we were to adopt that vacuous temporal notion, Amitie 10g was first blocked (for incivility) on 5 October 2015 and last blocked (for incivility - !!!) on 16 April 2017, a span well over a year, suggesting a mere year is not adequate; 2) Targeted bans may be effective when related to a specific topic/subject/venue, but behavioural issues, by definition, encompass every aspect of editing and Amitie 10g's hostility/incivility has not been limited to Ellin; 3) Abstention from socking is our expectation and requirement, not a sign of merit and indeed utterly meaningless when considering non-socking blocks; 4) This request is essentially the same as the previous request(s). That you did something wrong ("I know very well the reasons") is something of which we are well aware and does not indicate an understanding of why that something was wrong. Why was your behaviour unacceptable? Why did you not respond to warnings and blocks advising of the same? Why should we believe this time is different? (These are not rhetorical questions; I "know very well the reasons and I understand" is without genuine substance and someone with your block log needs to do very much better.) Further, "we need the collaboration of everyone" continues the problematic pattern of accusing others/deflecting responsibility pointed out in response(s) to previous unblock requests, and indeed undermines credibility. We are here to discuss your misbehaviour. Эlcobbola talk 21:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

If the community would agree to lift this block, I think an unblock should come with clear conditions. At his moment the project is relatively calm and the working conditions are relatively good. This is very important for a project with such a high workload. We really should try to remain a good working environment. Jcb (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

I would  Support an unblock, if this user had issues in lets say the Commons: and Commons talk: Namespaces or in deletion requests in particular he could simply be added to Commons:Editing restrictions with a ban on all namespaces except for "File:", "File talk:", "User:", "User talk:", and the mainspace, plus an interaction ban with Ellin Beltz and if he behaves can request an unban from particular namespaces such as categories or something in a few months or few years from now. From what I could tell this was a highly productive user with very few bad uploads and all he wants to do is upload so a ban from non-upload related spaces would keep be able to please both sides. I'm not sure if I have a say in this, this user just seems like he could add valuable images, and if he can't start deletion requests I don't see what further issues he could cause. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Well, since I have pending discussions, I agree the editing ban for non-File: nor User: nor-(main) namespaces and related, and also the ban for Commons: namespaces except the Village Pump maybe (to discusse few pending discussions, specially related to Copyright in Peru and the controverted CC-GobCL cases), and the AN to report vandalism; DRs and UnDRs may be discussed at the IRC first, since I found some false positive deletions (unless an Admin tell me to answer a DR or open an UnDR, I'll refrain to edit there). I should be also able to answer DRs for files I uploaded (at least the files I own/created, even if the nominator is one of those users I have interaction ban), and editing templates and translations. For the Interaction ban, nothing to say, unless she asks me something in a discussion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose I do not support an unblock due to behavior of user, unnecessary drama and also that they created a lot more work for administrators due to their personal interpretation of the rules & policies of Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ellin Beltz with regret. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 10:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support A year is a very long time to leave a user who is active on other Wikimedia projects blocked, especially on Commons where users can easily contribute without engaging in noticeboard drama. Were there a global ban there may be a case for leaving the indefinite block. We should recognize that after causing personal offence there will be some people that may never be content with seeing the account active again, however that Amitie has avoided socking or trying a clean start to get around the block, demonstrates that they have attempted to comply with policies during their year away and this request should be taken in good faith as presented. --Fæ (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
• Would you be open to an interaction ban (as in w:WP:IBAN) with Ellin? Also, would you be willing to just grit your teeth and go along with the common interpretation of policy? How about a ban on noticeboard drama? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

• As I mentioned above, I agree the Interaction ban. The rest, I would prefer to discusse in the IRC before making any mistake. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Agree with Fæ, a year is long enough to give them a chance to prove they have changed. It would likely be best for Amitie 10g to stay away from Ellin, but they agreed to that. If ever needed, I am also willing to offer Amitie to come to my talk page to discuss issues where he has trouble figuring out how to respond, I may be able to help him convey the message in a more neutral way. Just an offer, Amitie doesn't have to take me up on it if he doesn't want to. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
• Taivo would you like to comment on this user unblock request? Regards T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 17:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

During summer vacation I am semi-retired, but I agree with Эlcobbola's closing. Taivo (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ellin Beltz.--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

File:4-(4-Bromofenylo)-2-metylotiofen.svg

File:4-(4-Bromofenylo)-2-metylotiofen.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:4-(4-Bromofenylo)-2-metylotiofen.svg Wostr (talk) 01:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Commons:Moving files to Commons

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Commons:Moving files to Commons está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es baja.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Frankfurt-azad-logo.svg

File:Frankfurt-azad-logo.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frankfurt-azad-logo.svg E4024 (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD Vietnam Government

Affected:

• File:Flag of Central Highlands Liberation Front.svg

Yours sincerely, please check the deletion request page for your image(s) uploaded per PD-VietnamGov minhhuy ^(talk) 03:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request as active member of Wikipedia

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "A long time passed since the last block. As I'm an active member of the Spanish Wikipedia, I want to contribute with files, and I have several ones to upload. I promise to don't repeat the past behaviour and just contribute by uploading files and participate under the conditions given by concensus." Decline reason: "As was previously explained, the passage of time is not germane. Our criteria are an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. You were asked specific, non-rhetorical questions to assess against these criteria, yet this request ignores those questions and essentially repeats the entirely inadequate previous request. This is not a venue in which you repeat unresponsive requests until you get the answer you want. If you are not prepared to engage with our criteria, you should be prepared to remain blocked. Эlcobbola talk 20:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

And please block Davod and delete the user page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral - it's all a long time ago and even if we unblock them now we can always reblock them if they would continue the past behaviour - Jcb (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
• Elcobbola, I expected more comments before your closing few ours after my request. As I mentioned, I agree to edit under the restrictions recommended by the users in previous requests, and I already recognized my misbehaviour against fellows.

So, if I remain blocked, could request fellows to upload files without being considered as bad faith actions? Thanks for the comments. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock requests do not require comments from others; they are reviewed by an administrator per both COM:BLOCK and {{Unblock}} based on their own merits. One notes, again, a complete and telling unwillingness to engage with the questions. Users who edit on behalf of a blocked user are eligible to be blocked for meatpupptry, as that is a deliberate use of an alternative account to circumvent a community sanction. Эlcobbola _talk 21:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The problem with your rationale is it seems to be based on actions rather than intentions. I come here with the intentions for collaborate, and Commons is fundamental complement to Wikipedia and Wikidata, where, once again, I'm actively collaborating. What about blocking an established user just because uploaded a file I needed for articles I'm contributing? If the user is not assuming bad faith, why should be blocked? If I'm come here with the intentions for collaborate, why decide the block based on past actions? The evidence of my intentions for collaborating are the several editions in Wikipedia and Wikidata.

Also, the account Davod is still unblocked (and I already requested their block), that means I could use it for editing, but preferred to abstain using it as part of my block. At least, please take that request. Thanks again. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

My comments are agnostic with regard to intent; a desire to upload useful images is not relevant to a block for harassment/attacks/incivility. Indeed, as any intellectually honest person would be aware, the latter is not excused by the former. I still don't see an answer to the questions and thus will not be entertaining this further. Эlcobbola _talk 23:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

What did you mean with questions not answered? What questions? I already agree to edit under restrictions (in the File: namespace), and as I mentioned, avoiding the past behaviour means I'll avoid interaction with the users I harassed in the past and avoid participating ind discussions where potential harassment could ocurr. I don't want to harass, I want to contribute, and assumming good faith and the common sense are considered above any other policy (at least in the english Wikipedia). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Annexation Bill of 1866 map.jpg

File:Annexation Bill of 1866 map.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Annexation Bill of 1866 map.jpg Bearcat (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Adding to the talk page trimmer

Hi, based on discussion at the administrator's noticeboard, there is a consensus to go ahead with adding user talk pages that are unattended to be processed by the talk page trimmer. These cosmetic changes trim unnecessary boilerplate text in standard notices, lower the template transclusion count, and will make this talk page readable and quicker to render for all readers, without losing any content. Other users have asked to be added to this housekeeping task for this reason.

Please leave a note on my user talk page, or email me, if you would like to opt-out. If changes by the trimmer are reverted, they are likely to be re-implemented automatically unless opted-out. Thanks --Fæ (User talk:Fæ) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Unblock for a start over

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "As I'm still active and I'm still want to contribute, I request, once again, unblocking my account in good faith. First, I apologize for my past behaviour, specially with User:Ellin Beltz, and anyone deserves a chance if they really want to collaborate constructively. As the Partial blocks is being discussed, I agree with an interaction ban in addition of editing at limited namespaces; for now, I want to upload files (editing only at the File: namespaces. Two years and a half passes, so I believe is enough time to accept me again, as I'm want to contribute. Thanks and Merry Christmas. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)" Decline reason: "As was previously explained, our criteria are an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. This request does not provide (or even attempt to provide) these and, yet again, continues to ignore specific, non-rhetorical questions to assess against those criteria, which is telling. Also telling, for example, is your recent (September 2019) block on a sister project for "disruptive attitude" ("actitud disruptiva") for three months (!!!). This indeed suggests you in fact do not understand the issue, do not intend to remedy the issue, or both. This is not a venue to repeat non-responsive requests until you get the answer you want and continuing to do so may result in the loss of your ability to edit your talk page. Эlcobbola talk 19:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

• PS: Please keep my doppelganger account blocked even if my main account being unblocked. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

• Elcobbola (and involved users), I am sorry for not previously answering the specific questions. I have taken the time to deeply consider them and reflect on my actions.

Then, answering your questions...

• Why was my behaviour unacceptable? Because I'm acted disruptively (mistakes when commenting in DRs) and uncivil, making others (specially Ellin Beltz) feeling bad.
• Why did me not respond to warnings and blocks advising of the same? Because I've too busy, but also I have been neglected for my own behaviour, and I'm somewaht nervious when questioning me.
• Why should you believe this time is different? So, I cooled down, and I'm awaited for start over. I'm still active in other projects, constructively contributing (my block at Spanish Wikipedia was a stumble I don't want to repeat). Marcelo (the one who reported me) still believes and trust me as a good editor and I'm still welcome there, this is why I believe I would be welcome here.

Thanks for understanding. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es alta.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 06:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Pennant of Päijänne Tavastia.svg

File:Pennant of Päijänne Tavastia.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pennant of Päijänne Tavastia.svg Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp

File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:SMB2 titlescreen logo.webp Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request for Christmas

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "So, I've awaiting for another unblock request. Almost three years passed, however, this haven't stop me contributing in other projects like Wikipedia and Wikidata, and I want to return to Commons for contributing with graphics. Again, I recognize and I apologize for my past behaviour with fellow contributors (admins included), and also considering the last block has been performed by a now globally blocked user under a sockpuppet. Also, I compromise to don´t confront others users and make constructive discussions, if the community allow me to participate in DRs and so on; I'll focus on uploading files, mainly logos and graphics. Thanks in advance." Decline reason: "Because Ellin does not want that. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Could you please explain what has changed since your last request? While I am glad to see that you are actively participating on other projects, you have been blocked elsewhere for similar behaviour Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

So, the latest block in other projects are more as an unfortunated set of successes than an unambiguous disruption and harassment (the main reason I were blocked here), and as I'm were active in other projects with good contributions, I'm still finding another chance here to make good contributions under restrictions, as I'm already apologized for my past behaviour. Thanks for your consideration. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

I continue to oppose unblocking of this user for all the reasons that have been discussed before as above ad infinitum. Having been the primary person on the receiving end of unpleasant behavior (as distinguished from anti-project behavior which resulted in the block by another administrator), I oppose unblocking and will continue to oppose unblocking this user. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Amitie 10g
	Hi Amitie 10g, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia this past year,    –Davey2010talk 21:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Cris Tales logo.png

File:Cris Tales logo.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cris Tales logo.png Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Dongfeng Sokon (DFSK) logo.svg

File:Dongfeng Sokon (DFSK) logo.svg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dongfeng Sokon (DFSK) logo.svg Minorax^talk 11:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Signal flags of the Mexico Navy This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected File:Bandera naval del Puerto de Veracruz.svg

Yours sincerely, GPinkerton (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Amitie 10g
	Hi Amitie 10g, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

File:Pinochestein 3D logo.png

File:Pinochestein 3D logo.png has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pinochestein 3D logo.png This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

✗plicit 01:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Yet another unblock request

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Once again, I request my unblock, as enough time passed and I learned from the past. I already apologized form my past behaviour, and I really want to contribute the project in a constructive way. Thanks in advance. Amitie 10g (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Because Ellin does not want that. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Question Why the sole posture of a sole, involved user should be used to resolve this unblock request in a concluyent way, without taking the input on a broader part of the community, rather than discrimination? And also, should be the latest user who blocked me (User:INeverCry) a consideration for the block? Thanks. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2022 está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es media.

Winners just announced

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 09:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

File:American Airlines wordmark (2013).svg

File:American Airlines wordmark (2013).svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/American Airlines logos This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 -- Great Brightstar (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2023

Hola, Amitie 10g:

Has recibido esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de español en Wikimedia Commons. La página Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:

• traducir al español

Wiki Loves Folklore starts on 1st of February and we need your help in translation of the main page in your local language.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Wikimedia Commons funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe.

Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de notificación.

¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Wikimedia Commons‎, 05:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

File:2012 BWF logo.svg

File:2012 BWF logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Logo de fédération, non libre de droit Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

KA^{Pour les intimes} 14:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

File:2012 BWF logo.svg

File:2012 BWF logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: violation des droits d'auteuir Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

KA^{Pour les intimes} 22:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

File:2012 BWF logo.svg

File:2012 BWF logo.svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:2012 BWF logo.svg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KA^{Pour les intimes} 22:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Too many years

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "The reasons for why I got blocked is quite clear. But is not clear why the previous requests for unblock has been denied. As a long-term contributor, I assume good faith when interacting with other users aand I assuming good faith when opening this request, sinde too many years passed, and I want contribute constructively. Also, the other reason for requesting this, is the fact I got bocked by the INC's sockpuppet, globally blocked. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Users can be unblocked, if they understand, why they are blocked, and give a credible promise not to continue. Neither can be seen here. Reasons of decline of previous unblock requests are totally clear. While INC really got mad and was indefinitely blocked and later even banned for that, his decisions to block users (just like his decisions to delete files) were not disputed. Your promise to contribute constructively is very vague and does not show your understanding of constructive contribution. You see, that I did not want to close the request: all your unblock requests were closed by me only after many days – I waited comments or even closure by other users, probably they did not want to say anything as well. Now 4 your unblock requests in row have been declined and I reblock you without talkpage access. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

File:Imagefilledarc.svg

File:Imagefilledarc.svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:3D charts This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Apocheir.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

File:Phisical Map of the World - January 2015.svg

File:Phisical Map of the World - January 2015.svg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Phisical Map of the World - January 2015.svg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Connor Irwin (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)